Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/msm/adreno: add Adreno 810 GPU support

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 4/3/26 12:14 AM, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 1st, 2026 at 6:15 AM, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>> I may be on an older tag or something, but:
>>
>> $ diff /tmp/downstream.txt /tmp/upstream.txt
>> 24a25
>>> { GEN7_SP_READ_SEL, 0x0001ff00, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>> 27,28c28,29
>> < { GEN8_TPL1_DBG_ECO_CNTL1, 0x04000724, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>> < { GEN8_UCHE_MODE_CNTL, 0x00020000, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>> ---
>>> { GEN8_TPL1_DBG_ECO_CNTL1, 0x04000720, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>>> { GEN8_UCHE_MODE_CNTL, 0x80080000, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>> 31,32c32
>> < /* Disable write slow pointer in data phase queue */
>> < { GEN8_UCHE_HW_DBG_CNTL, BIT(8), BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>> ---
>>> { GEN8_UCHE_CACHE_WAYS, 0x00080000, BIT(PIPE_NONE) },
>>
>>
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const u32 a810_protect_regs[] = {
>>
>> $ diff /tmp/downstream.txt /tmp/upstream.txt
>>
>> < A6XX_PROTECT_NORDWR(0x0ae00, 0x0),
>> < A6XX_PROTECT_NORDWR(0x0ae02, 0x4),
>> ---
>>> A6XX_PROTECT_NORDWR(0x0ae00, 0x6),
>>
>> -> the difference is that
>>
>> SP_DBG_ECO_CNTL and SP_ADDR_MODE_CNTL are not protected
>>
>> that might have been a part of the ^ difference
> 
> Going back for v2 and making sure this is 1:1 to GRAPHICS.LA.14.0.r5-03100-lanai.0, I
> think I was going back and forth between my own downstream from the OEM,
> GRAPHICS.LA.14.0.r5 and GRAPHICS.LA.15.0.r1.
> 
> GRAPHICS.LA.15.0.r1 has gen8_3_0 support, but I'm not sure if there are any
> devices that actually ship with it on that branch. Seemed to be fairly out
> of sync from LA.14.
> 
>>
>> Also it may be that the better name for this table is a830_protect_regs[]
> 
> Can you elaborate on this? The only names I know this GPU by are "a810" and
> "gen8_3_0".

gen8_0_x is A830 (8750), which seems to have some sort of a common lineage

Konrad