Re: [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()
From: Heming Zhao
Date: Tue Apr 07 2026 - 11:02:30 EST
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 05:08:01PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> The full extent list check is introduced by commit 44acc46d182f, which
> is to avoid NULL pointer dereference if a dirent is not found.
>
> Reworking the error message to not reference rec. Instead, report
> major_hash being looked up and l_next_free_rec, which naturally covers
> both failure cases (empty extent list and no matching record) without
> needing a separate l_next_free_rec == 0 guard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 15 +++------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> index 82e720c8ba32..d94595a49923 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
> @@ -835,14 +835,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
> }
> }
>
> - if (le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) == 0) {
> - ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has empty extent list at depth %u\n",
> - inode->i_ino,
> - le16_to_cpu(el->l_tree_depth));
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> found = 0;
> for (i = le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> rec = &el->l_recs[i];
> @@ -855,10 +847,9 @@ static int ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec(struct inode *inode,
>
> if (!found) {
> ret = ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Inode %lu has bad extent record (%u, %u, 0) in btree\n",
> - inode->i_ino,
> - le32_to_cpu(rec->e_cpos),
> - ocfs2_rec_clusters(el, rec));
> + "Inode %lu has no extent record for hash %u in btree (next_free_rec %u)\n",
> + inode->i_ino, major_hash,
> + le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec));
> goto out;
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.3
>