Re: [RFC PATCH v9 2/2] sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Thu Apr 20 2023 - 10:35:21 EST
On 2023-04-20 09:54, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
On 2023-04-20 09:35, Aaron Lu wrote:
[...]
Then we clearly have another member of mm_struct on the same cache
line as
pcpu_cid which is bouncing all over the place and causing
false-sharing. Any
idea which field(s) are causing this ?
That's my first reaction too but as I said in an earlier reply:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230419080606.GA4247@ziqianlu-desk2/
I've tried to place pcpu_cid into a dedicate cacheline with no other
fields sharing a cacheline with it in mm_struct but it didn't help...
I see two possible culprits there:
1) The mm_struct pcpu_cid field is suffering from false-sharing. I
would be
interested to look at your attempt to move it to a separate cache
line to
try to figure out what is going on.
Brain damaged...my mistake, I only made sure its following fields not
share the same cacheline but forgot to exclude its preceding fields and
turned out it's one(some?) of the preceeding fields that caused false
sharing. When I did:
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 5eab61156f0e..a6f9d815991c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
*/
atomic_t mm_count;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
+ CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad1_);
/**
* @pcpu_cid: Per-cpu current cid.
*
mm_cid_get() dropped to 0.0x% when running hackbench :-)
Now we are talking! :)
sched_mm_cid_migrate_to() is about 4% with most cycles spent on
accessing mm->mm_users:
│ dst_cid = READ_ONCE(dst_pcpu_cid->cid);
0.03 │ mov 0x8(%r12),%r15d
│ if (!mm_cid_is_unset(dst_cid) &&
0.07 │ cmp $0xffffffff,%r15d
│ ↓ je 87
│ arch_atomic_read():
│ {
│ /*
│ * Note for KASAN: we deliberately don't use
READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() here,
│ * it's non-inlined function that increases binary size
and stack usage.
│ */
│ return __READ_ONCE((v)->counter);
76.13 │ mov 0x54(%r13),%eax
│ sched_mm_cid_migrate_to():
│ cmp %eax,0x410(%rdx)
21.71 │ ↓ jle 1d8
│ atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) >= t->nr_cpus_allowed)
With this info, it should be mm_users that caused false sharing for
pcpu_cid previously. Looks like mm_users is bouncing.
I suspect that the culprit here is mm_count rather than mm_users.
mm_users just happens to share the same cache line as mm_count.
mm_count is incremented/decremented with mmgrab()/mmdrop() during
context switch.
This is likely causing other issues, for instance, the
membarrier_state field is AFAIR read-mostly, used for
membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() to issue core
sync before every return to usermode if needed.
Other things like mm_struct pgd pointer appear to be likely
read-mostly variables.
I suspect it's mm_count which should be moved to its own cache line
to eliminate false-sharing with all the other read-mostly fields
of mm_struct.
I have prepared a patch which moves the mm_count field into its own
cache line, but after a quick discussion with Peter Zijlstra, it appears
that the work on lazy-tlb refcounting currently in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=x86/lazy
will take care of this by entirely removing the reference counting for lazy TLB.
So with this, I suspect we are as good as we can be in terms of near-zero
footprint for the mm_cid feature, right ?
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index a57e6ae78e65..f740fa447df1 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -553,6 +553,21 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
struct kioctx_table;
struct mm_struct {
struct {
+ /*
+ * Fields which are often written to are placed in a separate
+ * cache line.
+ */
+ struct {
+ /**
+ * @mm_count: The number of references to &struct mm_struct
+ * (@mm_users count as 1).
+ *
+ * Use mmgrab()/mmdrop() to modify. When this drops to 0, the
+ * &struct mm_struct is freed.
+ */
+ atomic_t mm_count;
+ } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
struct maple_tree mm_mt;
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
unsigned long (*get_unmapped_area) (struct file *filp,
@@ -590,14 +605,6 @@ struct mm_struct {
*/
atomic_t mm_users;
- /**
- * @mm_count: The number of references to &struct mm_struct
- * (@mm_users count as 1).
- *
- * Use mmgrab()/mmdrop() to modify. When this drops to 0, the
- * &struct mm_struct is freed.
- */
- atomic_t mm_count;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
/**
* @cid_lock: Protect cid bitmap updates vs lookups.
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com