Re: [PATCH 00/16] mm/shmem: various (urgent?) fixes

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 10/27/26 12:37, Gregory Price (Meta) wrote:
> On 2026-10-27 10:34 +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 10/26/26 22:24, Gregory Price (Meta) wrote:
>>>
>>> It's there to show the work more than to merge, but the long-term goal
>>> here is to feed these tests into a larger session that does the polish.
>>
>> Agreed. But a note that if these essentially contain reproducers that can cause
>> harm on real systems, posting them upstream might not be a very good idea until
>> fixed.
>>
>> Well, unless people can trivially generate them already.
>>
> 
> Nothing here has been generated by anything the public does not have
> access to with a $20 subscription or enough RAM to a run a decent
> model locally. Otherwise I wouldn't have posted it.
> 
> Posting the patch is the full disclosure at this point.

Agreed.

I'll post a v2 rather soonish to move forward with that.

-- 
Cheers,

David