Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-dsp: Allow referencing the timers' power domains

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 08:39:28AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> A firmware may drive the core's timers, which need their power domains
> held; the remoteproc driver does not hold them, so let the DSP node
> reference them for a driver that attaches to the running core to hold.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> v3:
> - Initial version
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> index d6319c8e96f8..80eaef0a19b8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> @@ -76,6 +76,23 @@ properties:
>  # Optional properties:
>  # --------------------
>  
> +  power-domains:
> +    description: |
> +      Power domains of the SoC timers the running firmware ticks on and
> +      times its work out with. The firmware programs these timers itself
> +      and makes no power request for them, and the timers' own nodes are
> +      reserved for it, so nothing else requests their power; a client
> +      driver of the firmware holds them on while it drives the processor.
> +      The processor's own power is managed through ti,sci-dev-id, not here.
> +    items:
> +      - description: power domain of the first timer

first timer

> +      - description: power domain of the second timer

second timer

No need to say that power domain is a power domain.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Krzysztof