Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] workqueue: Make alloc_workqueue() unbound by default

[Breno Leitao]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 04:01:47PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> +	if (unlikely(wq_unbound_by_default))
> +		pr_warn_once("workqueue: %s is using neither WQ_PERCPU or WQ_UNBOUND. "
> +			     "Setting WQ_UNBOUND.\n", wq->name);

Why do we need to warn here? With this new approach, shouldn't users be
able to rely on WQ_UNBOUND being the default and leave it out?

Thanks,
--breno