Re: [PATCH hazptr v3 1/4] hazptr: Fix two-phase hazptr_synchronize race with detach

From: KunWu Chan

Date: Fri Oct 16 2026 - 04:36:33 EST


Hi Mathieu,

Scanning all per-CPU slots before the overflow lists
addresses the race where a backup slot can be moved to
a list that has already been scanned.

Using a separate overflow-list phase also decouples list
selection from the wildcard phase.


Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Kunwu

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 3:49 AM Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Boqun Feng pointed out that a detach happening concurrently with
> hazptr_synchronize can miss a slot. Indeed, scanning the per-CPU
> slots needs to be done *before* scanning the overflow lists. Fix the
> implementation accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bradley Morgan <brads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Gary Guo <gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <lkmm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v0:
> - Load the new overflow list phase word in "hazptr_chain_backup_slot".
> - Rename the lock to hazptr_phase_lock to make it clear that it
> protects both the wildcard and the overflow list phases.
> ---
> kernel/hazptr.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/hazptr.c b/kernel/hazptr.c
> index d3d1050d92cf..13faa5ba7677 100644
> --- a/kernel/hazptr.c
> +++ b/kernel/hazptr.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
>
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_phase_lock); /* Protect the wildcard and list phase flip. */
> +
> /*
> * The current hazard pointer wildcard. Flips between 1UL and 2UL to guarantee
> * hazptr_synchronize forward progress even with a steady stream of readers.
> @@ -20,10 +22,12 @@
> * This also affects the overflow list selection: the current list used by
> * readers is array[(unsigned long) hazptr_wildcard - 1].
> */
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(hazptr_wildcard_lock); /* Protect the wildcard flip. */
> void *hazptr_wildcard = (void *) 1UL;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_wildcard);
>
> +/* The current overflow list phase. */
> +static unsigned int hazptr_overflow_list_phase;
> +
> struct hazptr_overflow_list {
> raw_spinlock_t lock; /* Lock protecting overflow list and list generation. */
> struct hlist_head head; /* Overflow list head. */
> @@ -53,6 +57,12 @@ void *flip_wildcard(void *wildcard)
> return ((unsigned long) wildcard == 1UL) ? (void *) 2UL : (void *) 1UL;
> }
>
> +static
> +unsigned int flip_list_phase(unsigned int phase)
> +{
> + return 1 - phase;
> +}
> +
> static
> bool is_wildcard(void *addr)
> {
> @@ -178,15 +188,12 @@ void hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(int cpu, void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> }
>
> static
> -void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> +void hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> {
> - unsigned int scan_idx = (unsigned long) scan_wildcard - 1;
> int cpu;
>
> /* Scan all CPUs slots. */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
> -
> /*
> * Scan CPU slots.
> * Forward progress against recurring wildcards is guaranteed
> @@ -199,6 +206,17 @@ void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> * to acquire that same hazard pointer value.
> */
> hazptr_synchronize_cpu_slots(cpu, addr, scan_wildcard);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(void *addr, unsigned int scan_idx)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + /* Scan all CPUs overflow lists. */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = per_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip, cpu);
>
> /*
> * Scan backup slots in percpu overflow lists.
> @@ -218,6 +236,7 @@ void hazptr_scan_period(void *addr, void *scan_wildcard)
> */
> void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
> {
> + unsigned int scan_list_phase;
> void *scan_wildcard;
>
> /*
> @@ -235,18 +254,29 @@ void hazptr_synchronize(void *addr)
> /* Memory ordering: Store A before Load B. */
> smp_mb();
>
> - guard(mutex)(&hazptr_wildcard_lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&hazptr_phase_lock);
> +
> + /* Scan per-CPU slots. */
> scan_wildcard = flip_wildcard(hazptr_wildcard);
> - hazptr_scan_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
> - WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard); /* Flip the current wildcard. */
> - hazptr_scan_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
> + hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, scan_wildcard);
> + WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard, scan_wildcard); /* Flip the current wildcard. */
> + hazptr_scan_cpu_slots_period(addr, flip_wildcard(scan_wildcard));
> +
> + /*
> + * Scan overflow lists *after* scanning per-CPU slots. See
> + * hazptr_promote_to_backup_slot() for scan ordering requirement.
> + */
> + scan_list_phase = flip_list_phase(hazptr_overflow_list_phase);
> + hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(addr, scan_list_phase);
> + WRITE_ONCE(hazptr_overflow_list_phase, scan_list_phase); /* Flip the current list phase. */
> + hazptr_scan_overflow_list_period(addr, flip_list_phase(scan_list_phase));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hazptr_synchronize);
>
> struct hazptr_slot *hazptr_chain_backup_slot(struct hazptr_ctx *ctx)
> {
> struct hazptr_overflow_list_flip *overflow_list_flip = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_overflow_list_flip);
> - unsigned int list_idx = (unsigned long) READ_ONCE(hazptr_wildcard) - 1;
> + unsigned int list_idx = READ_ONCE(hazptr_overflow_list_phase);
> struct hazptr_overflow_list *overflow_list = &overflow_list_flip->array[list_idx];
> struct hazptr_slot *slot = &ctx->backup_slot.slot;
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>