Re: Fwd: [PATCH 4/5] can: peak_usb: validate channel numbers in PCAN-USB FD

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 12.10.2026 11:04:56, Stéphane Grosjean wrote:
> I need help (or training) to figure out how to deal with these AI bots:
>
> - How many of them are there before the changes are accepted? It seems
>   that even if a patch has passed the Sashiko filter, we should still
>   expect feedback from other bots...

There's https://sashiko.dev/ , which replies within minutes (as long as
you don't include the netdev mailing list).

And there's https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/, which embargoes the
review for ~24h, but runs several LLMs with better models.

> - The fact that there are multiple levels of bots isn’t a problem in
>   itself, and is understandable. That feedback arrives on v1 even though
>   v2 has already been analysed is also something I’m just learning: so
>   when can we consider it safe to push a new version without fear of
>   receiving comments on the previous one?

Maybe you can mark the v1 as obsolete yourself with replying "pw-bot: cr".
On a new line, without quotation marks, see:

https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/blob/main/mailbot.rst
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status
https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/blob/e03d912ce66fd5d427cb9cf900409e1abc6eeba2/mailbot.py#L52-L81

> - And finally, providing more explicit comments on our changes is also
>   a good thing. But when those comments themselves become a source of
>   problems and rejections—due to an overly nitpicky interpretation by a
>   bot—it becomes far too time-consuming:

yes known problem :/

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature