Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Variscite i.MX6ULZ board variants

[Stefano Radaelli]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:09:22AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
> > +          - const: variscite,dart-6ul-imx6ulz
> > +          - const: fsl,imx6ull
> > +          - const: fsl,imx6ulz
> 
> Is this the right order? Which one is superset of which?
> 

I followed the compatible order used by the existing i.MX6ULZ EVK
and had also noticed the comment questioning whether `fsl,imx6ull`
should come last.
On review, I agree: i.MX6ULZ is the reduced-feature variant, while
i.MX6ULL is the more general compatible.
We can use `fsl,imx6ulz` followed by `fsl,imx6ull` for the new
Variscite entries. I can also propose a separate patch to update
the existing EVK compatible order to match, what do you think?

Thank you,
Best Regards,
Stefano