Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/virt/tdx: Drop tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_*()

[Edgecombe, Rick P]

On Wed, 2026-09-23 at 10:18 +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> What about TDH.PHYMEM.CACHE.WB? Can it be dropped as well?

Apparently not. I'm not sure we can't push harder on it to drop that that too,
but it had a slightly different reason for existing apparently. There is a
different flag for it "SKIP_PHYMEM_CACHE_WB" which we don't check.

Since it isn't needed for huge page code reduction, I think it's not a
priority. 

Do you think it is worth mentioning here? Since it has a separate enumeration, I
thought it was separate enough to keep the log simpler. Keeping it down to what
is need to understand and not more.