Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI: intel-gw: Remove atu base assignment
From: Florian Eckert
Date: Fri Mar 27 2026 - 07:50:56 EST
On 2026-03-26 17:15, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 11:12:52AM +0100, Florian Eckert wrote:
In the current implementation, only one PCIe bridge is recognised. This
change removes the assignment of the ATU base address during host setup.
Instead, the ATU base address is read from the device tree. To do this,
the 'atu' range of the DTS entry must be changed for PCIe.
Old DTS entry for PCIe:
reg = <0xd1000000 0x1000>,
<0xd3000000 0x20000>,
<0xd0c41000.0x1000>;
reg-names = "dbi", "config", "app";
New DTS entry for PCIe
reg = <0xd1000000 0x1000>,
<0xd10c0000 0x1000>,
<0xd3000000 0x20000>,
<0xd0c41000.0x1000>;
reg-names = "dbi", "atu", "config", "app";
You just broke the DT backwards compatibility here. What if the driver is used
with an old DT that doesn't provide this 'atu' entry? The driver will break.
Moreover, this entry should be added to the DT binding first before any driver
change.
When I looked at the driver’s history, I found a note in a commit that the driver
is only used internally by Maxlinear [1]. The maintainer
'Lei Chuan Hua <lchuanhua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>' from Maxlinear was still active at
that time. He mentioned this on the LKML [2].
Therefore, backward compatibility shouldn’t be necessary.
Unfortunately, it’s already been three months since I last looked into this issue.
But as far as I can remember I have to read the 'atu' resource from DTS and so have
to remove this line so the driver does work again.
Because the resource is already initialized by the dwc core during the function
call 'dw_pcie_get_resources()'on line 141 [3]. This function is called in the DWC
host core [4]. This raises the question of why the driver is doing this itself at
all, when the core already handles it for us.
Additional, I have noticed that it seems to be bad practice to include this
resource information in the source code. This information should instead be
loaded via the DTS see commit [5].
If backwards compatibility isn't an issue, then the DWC core should handle
loading the 'atu' resource from the DTS.
Is that how you see it too?
Thanks for your time and review
- Florian
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/pci/controller/dwc?h=master&id=07ae413e169da3697e633dd4489db0d681a04460
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/BY3PR19MB507667CE7531D863E1E5F8AEBDD82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c#n141
[4] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c#n544
[5] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci?id=f500a2f1282750fb344ce535d78071cf1493efd1
Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert <fe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-gw.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-gw.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-gw.c
index 6bd25f8da605032bfdb97596fb3a1f6a03e88bfc..cec972d5aa9107d4708338bd7349415a31f0e688 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-gw.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-intel-gw.c
@@ -311,8 +311,6 @@ static int intel_pcie_host_setup(struct intel_pcie *pcie)
goto clk_err;
}
- pci->atu_base = pci->dbi_base + 0xC0000;
-
ret = phy_init(pcie->phy);
if (ret)
goto phy_err;
--
2.47.3