Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: qrtr: ns: Limit the maximum server registration per node

From: Simon Horman

Date: Fri Mar 27 2026 - 06:06:42 EST


On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 04:14:14PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Current code does no bound checking on the number of servers added per
> node. A malicious client can flood NEW_SERVER messages and exhaust memory.
>
> Fix this issue by limiting the maximum number of server registrations to
> 256 per node. If the NEW_SERVER message is received for an old port, then
> don't restrict it as it will get replaced.
>
> Note that the limit of 256 is chosen based on the current platform
> requirements. If requirement changes in the future, this limit can be
> increased.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 0c2204a4ad71 ("net: qrtr: Migrate nameservice to kernel from userspace")
> Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> net/qrtr/ns.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c
> index 3203b2220860..fb4e8a2d370d 100644
> --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c
> +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c
> @@ -67,8 +67,14 @@ struct qrtr_server {
> struct qrtr_node {
> unsigned int id;
> struct xarray servers;
> + u32 server_count;
> };
>
> +/* Max server limit is chosen based on the current platform requirements. If the
> + * requirement changes in the future, this value can be increased.
> + */
> +#define QRTR_NS_MAX_SERVERS 256
> +
> static struct qrtr_node *node_get(unsigned int node_id)
> {
> struct qrtr_node *node;
> @@ -229,6 +235,17 @@ static struct qrtr_server *server_add(unsigned int service,
> if (!service || !port)
> return NULL;
>
> + node = node_get(node_id);
> + if (!node)
> + return NULL;

This is not new behaviour added by patch, but If I understand things
correctly, node_get will allocate a new node if one doesn't already exist
for the node_id.

I am wondering if any bounds are placed on the number of nodes that can be
created. And, if not, is this a point of concern from a memory exhaustion
perspective?

...