[PATCH v7 04/16] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Drop redundant IRQC_TINT_START check in rzg2l_irqc_alloc()

[Biju]

From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The check `hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START` in rzg2l_irqc_alloc() is unnecessary
as the condition is already guaranteed to be false at that point in the
code. The outer `if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)` block ensures that hwirq
is always above IRQC_IRQ_COUNT before reaching this check, and since
IRQC_TINT_START <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT, the guard can never trigger.

Remove the dead code to simplify the allocation path.

Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v6->v7:
 * No change.
v5->v6:
 * No change.
v5:
 * New patch.
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
index eb01d4c5aca7..8587d4c5f110 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
@@ -491,9 +491,6 @@ static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT) {
 		tint = TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(hwirq);
 		hwirq = TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(hwirq);
-
-		if (hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START)
-			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1))
-- 
2.43.0