Re: [PATCH mm-new v8 2/4] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number

From: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)

Date: Wed Mar 25 2026 - 11:39:02 EST


On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 04:17:21PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/25/26 16:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:10:23 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>> No need to update the patch description.
> >>
> >> I will take a look at this (sorry for delay) but general point - while
> >> fix-patches are convenient, they're incredibly anti-reviewer.
>
> +1, I could have sworn we brought that up before. :)
>
> >>
> >> I hope at some point in the future we can move away from that so you can look at
> >> a series on list and know that what's shown there is the actual patch.
> >
> > Oh. I've never really received that message, at least not at all
> > clearly.
> >
> > I've been hoping that the -fix patches are actually pro-reviewer, for
> > those reviewers who have looked at the previous version. A full resend
> > of something you've already looked at is quite annoying!
> >
> > I try to mitigate that by sending the
> > heres-what-you-changed-since-last-time replies. It's a little more
> > work at this end, but that's not at all a problem.
> >
> > I see a couple of options here
> >
> > a) I can fold the -fix into the base patch then send out the
> > resulting diff as a reply-to-all.
> >
> > b) We can just deprecate the -fix things and ask people for full
> > resends.
> >
> > It depends on what people prefer. How do we determine that?
>
> I like "fix" for smaller "obvious" stuff where a resend is really just
> noise.
>
> But for bigger stuff I prefer a full resend (we can still have these
> temporary fixups, but for reviewers a follow-up resend is better).

Yeah, it's really about being able to come to a series later and be able to
comment line-by-line.

Really larger stuff should be resent I think, esp. if there's multiple
fixes in the series.

A reply with the same-patch-but-with-fix-applied would definitely be
useful!

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David

Thanks, Lorenzo