Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix deadlock if uvc_status_stop is called from async_ctrl.work
From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Mon Mar 23 2026 - 19:52:53 EST
Hi Sean,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:58:22AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> If a UVC camera has an asynchronous control, uvc_status_stop may be
> called from async_ctrl.work:
>
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
> uvc_ctrl_status_event()
> uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
> uvc_pm_put()
> uvc_status_put()
> uvc_status_stop()
> cancel_work_sync()
>
> This will cause a deadlock, since cancel_work_sync will wait for
> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work to complete before returning.
>
> Fix this by returning early from uvc_status_stop if we are currently in
> the work function. flush_status now remains false until uvc_status_start
> is called again, ensuring that uvc_ctrl_status_event_work won't resubmit
> the URB.
>
> Fixes: a32d9c41bdb8 ("media: uvcvideo: Make power management granular")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6733bdfb-3e88-479f-8956-ab09c04c433e@xxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Update comments with review feedback
> - Use flush_work instead of cancel_work_sync since the work should never
> be rescheduled.
>
> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> index 231cfee8e7c2c..ea45b11642e59 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ static int uvc_status_start(struct uvc_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
> if (!dev->int_urb)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * If the work called uvc_status_stop it may still be running. Wait for
> + * it to finish before we submit the urb.
> + */
> + flush_work(&dev->async_ctrl.work);
I assume the only way this can happen is for uvc_status_start() to run
after the uvc_status_put() call in
uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
uvc_ctrl_status_event()
uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
uvc_pm_put()
uvc_status_put()
returns. Is that right ? If so I'd like to capture that better in the
comment, as I have a feeling we'll need to revisit this code at some
point.
/*
* If the previous uvc_status_stop() call was from the async work, the
* work may still be running. Wait for it to finish before we submit the
* urb.
*/
And if that's not correct, there's something I don't get and a better
comment is even more important :-)
If the above change is fine, I can update the comment when applying, and
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This being said, I wonder if we could have a simpler implementation if
we always stopped the work and URB when the last userspace user goes
away, instead of keeping the device active until we get the asynchronous
control notification.
> +
> + /* Clear the flush status if we were previously stopped. */
> + smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
> +
> return usb_submit_urb(dev->int_urb, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -336,6 +345,15 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
> */
> smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, true);
>
> + /*
> + * If we are called from the event work function, the URB is guaranteed
> + * to not be in flight as it has completed and has not been resubmitted.
> + * There's no need to cancel the work (which would deadlock), or to kill
> + * the URB.
> + */
> + if (current_work() == &w->work)
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * Cancel any pending asynchronous work. If any status event was queued,
> * process it synchronously.
> @@ -354,15 +372,6 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
> */
> if (cancel_work_sync(&w->work))
> uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
> -
> - /*
> - * From this point, there are no events on the queue and the status URB
> - * is dead. No events will be queued until uvc_status_start() is called.
> - * The barrier is needed to make sure that flush_status is visible to
> - * uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() when uvc_status_start() will be called
> - * again.
> - */
> - smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
> }
>
> int uvc_status_resume(struct uvc_device *dev)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart