Re: [PATCH v2 12/19] i2c: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites

[Wolfram Sang]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 12:00:31PM -0400, Vineeth Pillai (Google) wrote:
> Replace trace_foo() with the new trace_call__foo() at sites already
> guarded by trace_foo_enabled(), avoiding a redundant
> static_branch_unlikely() re-evaluation inside the tracepoint.
> trace_call__foo() calls the tracepoint callbacks directly without
> utilizing the static branch again.
> 
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6

If the core of this series is accepted:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"To:"-Field of the message is empty!