Re: [PATCH 0/9] s390: Improve this_cpu operations

[Juergen Christ]

> This is a follow-up to Peter Zijlstra's in-kernel rseq RFC [1].
> 
> With the intended removal of PREEMPT_NONE this_cpu operations based on
> atomic instructions, guarded with preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pairs,
> become more expensive: the preempt_disable() / preempt_enable() pairs are
> not optimized away anymore during compile time.
> 
> In particular the conditional call to preempt_schedule_notrace() after
> preempt_enable() adds additional code and register pressure.
> 
> To avoid this Peter suggested an in-kernel rseq approach. While this would
> certainly work, this series tries to come up with a solution which uses
> less instructions and doesn't require to repeat instruction sequences.
> 
> The idea is that this_cpu operations based on atomic instructions are
> guarded with mvyi instructions:

Here and in other places in the commit messages and comments you refer
to a "mvyi" instruction.  This should always be "mviy".