Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] iio: proximity: add driver for ST VL53L1X ToF sensor

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 01:07:14 +0600
Siratul Islam <email@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add support for the STMicroelectronics VL53L1X Time-of-Flight
> ranging sensor with I2C interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Siratul Islam <email@xxxxxxxx>
Hi Siratul

Just a few minor things seeing as you are going to v7 anyway.
If you weren't I'd have applied some or maybe all of these as tweaks
whilst picking the driver up.

thanks,

Jonathan

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l1x-i2c.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l1x-i2c.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..771598b92e04
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l1x-i2c.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,820 @@


> +static irqreturn_t vl53l1x_trigger_handler(int irq, void *priv)
> +{
> +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = priv;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> +	struct vl53l1x_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	struct {
> +		u16 distance;
> +		aligned_s64 timestamp;
> +	} scan = {};
> +	unsigned int range_status;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, VL53L1X_RESULT__RANGE_STATUS,
> +			  &range_status);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto notify_and_clear_irq;
> +	if (FIELD_GET(VL53L1X_RANGE_STATUS_MASK, range_status) !=
> +		      VL53L1X_RANGE_STATUS_VALID)
> +		goto notify_and_clear_irq;
> +
> +	ret = vl53l1x_read_u16(data,
> +			       VL53L1X_RESULT__FINAL_CROSSTALK_CORRECTED_RANGE_MM_SD0,
> +			       &scan.distance);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto notify_and_clear_irq;
> +
> +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &scan,
> +					   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));

Use iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts() that also takes the size of the buffer
as a parameter.  That defends against mismatch in channel spec and the
buffer provided.  Can help catch some types of bugs.

> +
> +notify_and_clear_irq:
> +	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> +	vl53l1x_clear_irq(data);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}


> +static int vl53l1x_configure_irq(struct device *dev, int irq,
> +				 struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> +	struct vl53l1x_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, vl53l1x_irq_handler, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> +			       indio_dev->name, indio_dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, VL53L1X_SYSTEM__INTERRUPT_CONFIG_GPIO,
> +			   VL53L1X_INT_NEW_SAMPLE_READY);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +				     "failed to configure IRQ\n");

Andy already pointed out that easily fits on oneline.


> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vl53l1x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct vl53l1x_data *data;
> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> +				     I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK |
> +				     I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*data));
> +	if (!indio_dev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	data->irq = client->irq;
> +
> +	data->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &vl53l1x_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->regmap))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->regmap),
> +				     "regmap initialization failed\n");
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * vdd-supply is required in the DT binding but we
> +	 * continue if it is missing to support older DTs.

Given the driver does nothing different for an auto provided fake regulator
and one from DT, I'm not seeing the comment as particularly useful.

Drop it.

> +	 */
> +	data->vdd_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
> +	if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_supply))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->vdd_supply),
> +				     "Unable to get VDD regulator\n");