Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: arm-dma350: document generic and combined IRQ topologies

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/03/2026 10:58, Peter Chen wrote:
> On 26-03-20 10:43:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>
>> On 20/03/2026 10:38, Peter Chen wrote:
>>> On 26-03-20 10:12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 06:17:21PM +0800, Jun Guo wrote:
>>>>> Update the DMA-350 DT binding to match the current driver behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> Allow both:
>>>>> - "arm,dma-350" as the generic compatible, and
>>>>> - "cix,sky1-dma-350", "arm,dma-350" for SoC-specific fallback usage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also document interrupt topology variants supported by hardware
>>>>> integration:
>>>>> - one combined interrupt for all channels, or
>>>>> - one interrupt per channel (up to 8 channels).
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex.
>>>>
>>>> Wrong tag, please read carefully the guideline before using LLM tools.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> It is the trade off for coding-assistants.rst suggestion and
>>> passing checkpatch.pl. Currently, checkpatch.pl reports the
>>> error for tag without email address. So we choose to add tag
>>> description at patch context.
>>
>> You still have to use correct tag.
> 
> You mean even checkpatch.pl reports below error, we still add it
> "Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex" as tag?

Yes, after fixing the contents (that's not entirely correct format I
think). Hopefully someone will fix checkpatch one day...

> 
> WARNING: Non-standard signature: Assisted-by:
> #14:
> Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex
> 
> ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex'
> #14:
> Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex
> 
>> You ignored rest of the email
>> message, so I assume you agree that you should not send LLM microslop?
>>
> 
> I am not the patch author, Jun will reply it.

Ah, sorry, I did not notice that.


Best regards,
Krzysztof