Re: [PATCH 01/12] dt-bindings: i3c: Add mipi-i3c-static-method to support SETAASA

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 19/03/2026 18:01, Akhil R wrote:
>>
>>> more than one method. It also cannot represent the vendor extensions (Bit 2)
>>> cleanly. Would this be better if we use macros instead of raw numbers?
>>
>> Hoes does setting bit 2 differ from a string "vendor"?
> 
> Okay, a string array would handle those cases.
> 
> I am concerned if this can be a string array for the ACPI because the MIPI
> specification defines the property differently. Would it be fine to deviate
> from that specification in the ACPI? Or do you suggest to keep it as bitmap
> for the ACPI and use strings in DT?

We are not defining here a property for the ACPI. I don't suggest
anything for ACPI.

Best regards,
Krzysztof