Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v15 11/13] mm/khugepaged: avoid unnecessary mTHP collapse attempts
From: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
Date: Thu Mar 19 2026 - 12:05:18 EST
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 08:48:30PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/18/26 19:59, Nico Pache wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/17/26 4:35 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 08:26:31PM -0700, Nico Pache wrote:
> >>> There are cases where, if an attempted collapse fails, all subsequent
> >>> orders are guaranteed to also fail. Avoid these collapse attempts by
> >>> bailing out early.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> With David's concern addressed:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> mm/khugepaged.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> >>> index 1c3711ed4513..388d3f2537e2 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> >>> @@ -1492,9 +1492,42 @@ static int mthp_collapse(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> >>> ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, collapse_address, referenced,
> >>> unmapped, cc, mmap_locked,
> >>> order);
> >>> - if (ret == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> >>> +
> >>> + switch (ret) {
> >>> + /* Cases were we continue to next collapse candidate */
> >>> + case SCAN_SUCCEED:
> >>> collapsed += nr_pte_entries;
> >>> + fallthrough;
> >>> + case SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE:
> >>> continue;
> >>> + /* Cases were lower orders might still succeed */
> >>> + case SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE:
> >>> + case SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE:
> >>> + case SCAN_EXCEED_SWAP_PTE:
> >>> + case SCAN_EXCEED_SHARED_PTE:
> >>> + case SCAN_PAGE_LOCK:
> >>> + case SCAN_PAGE_COUNT:
> >>> + case SCAN_PAGE_LRU:
> >>> + case SCAN_PAGE_NULL:
> >>> + case SCAN_DEL_PAGE_LRU:
> >>> + case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
> >>> + case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
> >>> + case SCAN_ALLOC_HUGE_PAGE_FAIL:
> >>> + goto next_order;
> >>> + /* Cases were no further collapse is possible */
> >>> + case SCAN_CGROUP_CHARGE_FAIL:
> >>> + case SCAN_COPY_MC:
> >>> + case SCAN_ADDRESS_RANGE:
> >>> + case SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE:
> >>> + case SCAN_ANY_PROCESS:
> >>> + case SCAN_VMA_NULL:
> >>> + case SCAN_VMA_CHECK:
> >>> + case SCAN_SCAN_ABORT:
> >>> + case SCAN_PAGE_ANON:
> >>> + case SCAN_PMD_MAPPED:
> >>> + case SCAN_FAIL:
> >>> + default:
> >>
> >> Agree with david, let's spell them out please :)
> >
> > I believe David is arguing for the opposite. To drop all these spelt out cases
> > and just leave the default case.
> >
> > @david is that correct or did I misunderstand that.
>
> Either spell all out (no default) OR add a default.
>
> I prefer to just ... use the default :)
I mean yup that's fine too I guess, all or nothing, something in between is
weird!
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
Cheers, Lorenzo