Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: provide a top-level switch for Microchip platforms

[claudiu beznea]

On 3/18/26 10:21, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 9:58 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 11/03/2026 09:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > Here's the previous discussion when this was added not too long ago:
> > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811122053.4bfyoefln7wpz2a4@DEN-DL-M70577/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Daniel is probably the one that "needs" to answer this, I think the
> > > > > > lan969x is added recently enough for this to not be particularly
> > > > > > disruptive.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't get arguments there. The policy is one ARCH per vendor, so why
> > > > > exactly upstream would like to "having more granular control with
> > > > > separate"? That's downstream or vendor wishlist, not upstream.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Krzysztof
> > > >
> > > > The out-of-tree defconfig impact is minimal for us. As Conor mentioned, lan969x
> > > > was added fairly recently, so the number of affected users should be small.
> > > >
> > > > /Daniel
> > >
> > > So can this be picked up directly into ARM-SoC please?
> >
> > This should go rather via Microchip ARM64 tree.
>
> Hey Microchip maintainers, can you please pick it up for v7.1?

Applied to microchip-soc, thanks!

Will push it later today (infrastructure issue ATM).

Thank you,
Claudiu