Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G (taoyao) DTS
From: Stanislav Zaikin
Date: Wed Mar 18 2026 - 04:22:40 EST
On 3/16/26 9:47 PM, Val Packett wrote:
/home/user # cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/1d84000.ufshc/device_descriptor/specification_version
On 3/16/26 8:57 AM, Stanislav Zaikin wrote:
On 3/16/26 5:05 AM, Val Packett wrote:
On 3/5/26 6:39 AM, Stanislav Zaikin wrote:
Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G is a handset released in 2022
This commit has the following features working:
- Display (with simple fb)
- Touchscreen
- UFS
- Power and volume buttons
- Pinctrl
- RPM Regulators
- Remoteprocs - wifi, bluetooth
- USB (Device Mode)
[…]
+ vreg_l7b_2p96: ldo7 {
+ regulator-name = "vreg_l7b_2p96";
+ /* Constrained for UFS VCC, at least until UFS driver scales voltage */
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <2952000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <2952000>;
+ regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
+ };
[…]
+&ufs_mem_hc {
+ reset-gpios = <&tlmm 175 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+
+ vcc-supply = <&vreg_l7b_2p96>;
+ vcc-max-microamp = <800000>;
+ /*
+ * Technically l9b enables an eLDO (supplied by s1b) which then powers
+ * VCCQ2 of the UFS.
+ */
+ vccq-supply = <&vreg_l9b_1p2>;
+ vccq-max-microamp = <900000>;
If this device has UFS 3.x flash, which it most likely does, the copy-pasted eLDO comment does not apply.. and VCC range is 2.4V-2.7V, 2.95 is overvoltage!
Hello Val,
Thank you for the review.
Though you're right that this comment is a copy-paste, taoyao has ufs2. This is the explaining comment from the downstream sources:
/*
* Yupik target supports both UFS2.2 & UFS3.1, here
* vccq2 is supplied via eLDO, [..]
So I thought it's better to keep a small comment regarding eLDO.
That's a comment from the qcom reference sources! I've literally seen it already in the downstream DTS for the device I'm currently working on (motorola-dubai) which definitely has UFS 3, hehe.
You can read /sys/bus/platform/devices/1d84000.ufshc/device_descriptor/specification_version to see which UFS spec version your flash is (0x310 == 3.1 etc.)
0x0220
(Lots of interesting stuff around there, there's also health_descriptor that shows your flash's wear estimation..)Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find schematics. It also a bummer that I don't know panel's name because I have a (semi-generated) driver for it.
Also if you have the schematics, you can check for whether an LDO is actually present there and whether VCCQ or VCCQ2 is connected :)
If it's actually UFS 2 after all, it would be better to rename the property to vccq2-supply.Could you elaborate please? Do you mean l9b?
No, the "vccq-supply". If you look at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-common.yaml you can see it supports both `vccq-supply` and `vccq2-supply`, the former is used for UFS3 and the latter for UFS2.
Will fix it in v5. Thanks a lot for so many inputs!
Best regards,
Stanislav