Re: [PATCH] mm: filemap: fix nr_pages calculation overflow in filemap_map_pages()
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Date: Tue Mar 17 2026 - 16:51:53 EST
On 3/17/26 10:37, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/17/26 10:29, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> When running stress-ng on my Arm64 machine with v7.0-rc3 kernel, I encountered
>> some very strange crash issues showing up as "Bad page state":
>>
>> "
>> [ 734.496287] BUG: Bad page state in process stress-ng-env pfn:415735fb
>> [ 734.496427] page: refcount:0 mapcount:1 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x4cf316 pfn:0x415735fb
>> [ 734.496434] flags: 0x57fffe000000800(owner_2|node=1|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3ffff)
>> [ 734.496439] raw: 057fffe000000800 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
>> [ 734.496440] raw: 00000000004cf316 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>> [ 734.496442] page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
>> "
>>
>> After analyzing this page’s state, it is hard to understand why the mapcount
>> is not 0 while the refcount is 0, since this page is not where the issue first
>> occurred. By enabling the CONFIG_DEBUG_VM config, I can reproduce the crash as
>> well and captured the first warning where the issue appears:
>>
>> "
>> [ 734.469226] page: refcount:33 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000bef2d187 index:0x81a0 pfn:0x415735c0
>> [ 734.469304] head: order:5 mapcount:0 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
>> [ 734.469315] memcg:ffff000807a8ec00
>> [ 734.469320] aops:ext4_da_aops ino:100b6f dentry name(?):"stress-ng-mmaptorture-9397-0-2736200540"
>> [ 734.469335] flags: 0x57fffe400000069(locked|uptodate|lru|head|node=1|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x3ffff)
>> ......
>> [ 734.469364] page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO((_Generic((page + nr_pages - 1),
>> const struct page *: (const struct folio *)_compound_head(page + nr_pages - 1), struct page *:
>> (struct folio *)_compound_head(page + nr_pages - 1))) != folio)
>> [ 734.469390] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 734.469393] WARNING: ./include/linux/rmap.h:351 at folio_add_file_rmap_ptes+0x3b8/0x468,
>> CPU#90: stress-ng-mlock/9430
>> [ 734.469551] folio_add_file_rmap_ptes+0x3b8/0x468 (P)
>> [ 734.469555] set_pte_range+0xd8/0x2f8
>> [ 734.469566] filemap_map_folio_range+0x190/0x400
>> [ 734.469579] filemap_map_pages+0x348/0x638
>> [ 734.469583] do_fault_around+0x140/0x198
>> ......
>> [ 734.469640] el0t_64_sync+0x184/0x188
>> "
>>
>> The code that triggers the warning is: "VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(page_folio(page + nr_pages - 1) != folio, folio)",
>> which indicates that set_pte_range() tried to map beyond the large folio’s
>> size.
>>
>> By adding more debug information, I found that 'nr_pages' had overflowed in
>> filemap_map_pages(), causing set_pte_range() to establish mappings for a range
>> exceeding the folio size, potentially corrupting fields of pages that do not
>> belong to this folio (e.g., page->_mapcount).
>>
>> After above analysis, I think the possible race is as follows:
>>
>> CPU 0 CPU 1
>> filemap_map_pages() ext4_setattr()
>> //get and lock folio with old inode->i_size
>> next_uptodate_folio()
>>
>> .......
>> //shrink the inode->i_size
>> i_size_write(inode, attr->ia_size);
>>
>> //calculate the end_pgoff with the new inode->i_size
>> file_end = DIV_ROUND_UP(i_size_read(mapping->host), PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
>> end_pgoff = min(end_pgoff, file_end);
>>
>> ......
>> //nr_pages can be overflowed, cause xas.xa_index > end_pgoff
>> end = folio_next_index(folio) - 1;
>> nr_pages = min(end, end_pgoff) - xas.xa_index + 1;
>>
>> ......
>> //map large folio
>> filemap_map_folio_range()
>> ......
>> //truncate folios
>> truncate_pagecache(inode, inode->i_size);
>>
>> To fix this issue, move the 'end_pgoff' calculation before next_uptodate_folio(),
>> so the retrieved folio stays consistent with the file end to avoid 'nr_pages'
>> calculation overflow. After this patch, the crash issue is gone.
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
I just skimmed over the AI review:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/1cf1ac59018fc647a87b0dad605d4056a71c14e4.1773739704.git.baolin.wang%40linux.alibaba.com
And I'm not sure if it has a point, in particular whether
i_size_read(mapping->host) could return 0 and underflow file_end.
I'd assume, in that case (truncation succeeded), also the
next_uptodate_folio() would fail.
But it's tricky :)
--
Cheers,
David