Re: [PATCH] idpf: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq

[Tony Nguyen]

On 3/14/2026 9:10 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:08:57 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Process question - even tho you are also a maintainer I only read
> Tony's tags as "please apply directly". LMK if that's right, I'll
> try to remember / make a note..

I talked to Przemek about this a little this morning. Since the 
Reviewed-by tag is used more prevalently in our process, perhaps an 
Acked-by could mean take this directly and the Reviewed-by keeps the 
same process of going through IWL. Other thought would be to explicitly 
ask/state for it to get taken directly. Open to other ideas as well if 
there's something else you'd prefer.

Thanks,
Tony