RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] iommufd/vdevice: add TSM guest request ioctl

[Tian, Kevin]

> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 7:17 PM
> 
> Add IOMMU_VDEVICE_TSM_GUEST_REQUEST for issuing TSM guest
> request/response
> transactions against an iommufd vdevice.

Does adding '_GUEST_' in the name give any meaningful context?
It's a transparent interface connecting to tsm. why do we care
whether this request actually comes from guest or from the VMM
itself? will there be a TSM_HOST_REQUEST in the future?

I know this has been made this way in many places in this path.
but from uapi p.o.v. let's stick to the minimal required naming.

> 
> The ioctl takes a vdevice_id plus request/response user buffers and length
> fields, and forwards the request through tsm_guest_req() to the PCI TSM
> backend. This provides the host-side passthrough path used by CoCo guests
> for TSM device attestation and acceptance flows after the device has been
> bound to TSM.

tsm cores use "TVM". let's be consistent here (regarding to 'CoCo guests')