Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ICE phandle

[Neeraj Soni]

On 3/11/2026 11:46 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 05:05:55PM +0530, Neeraj Soni wrote:
>> Starting with sc7280(kodiak), the ICE will have its own device-tree node.
>> So add the qcom,ice property to reference it.
>>
>> To avoid double-modeling, when qcom,ice is present, disallow an embedded
>> ICE register region in the SDHCI node. Older SoCs without ICE remain
>> valid as no additional requirement is imposed.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Co-developed-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Soni <neeraj.soni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
> 
> Can you please finally start using b4? Except errors in your process I
> don't see links to previous discussions either.
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

I understand that a repost is not needed only to add the tag but in
this case whether a repost is expected since a new patch 'v6' was
posted without 'Reviewed-by:' tag which was provided on 'v5'?

> 
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
Regards,
Neeraj