Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] selftests/mm: Add support to test 4PB VA on PPC64

From: Donet Tom
Date: Thu Jul 03 2025 - 10:52:00 EST



On 7/3/25 8:11 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
On 3 Jul 2025, at 2:06, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:

From: Donet Tom <donettom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

PowerPC64 supports a 4PB virtual address space, but this test was
previously limited to 512TB. This patch extends the coverage up to
the full 4PB VA range on PowerPC64.

Memory from 0 to 128TB is allocated without an address hint, while
allocations from 128TB to 4PB use a hint address.

Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
index e24c36a39f22..619acf0b9239 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/virtual_address_range.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
#define NR_CHUNKS_256TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 2UL)
#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 3UL)
#define NR_CHUNKS_3840TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 30UL)
+#define NR_CHUNKS_3968TB (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 31UL)

#define ADDR_MARK_128TB (1UL << 47) /* First address beyond 128TB */
#define ADDR_MARK_256TB (1UL << 48) /* First address beyond 256TB */
@@ -59,6 +60,11 @@
#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 49
#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW NR_CHUNKS_256TB
#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH NR_CHUNKS_3840TB
+#elif defined(__PPC64__)
+#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK ADDR_MARK_128TB
+#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
+#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW NR_CHUNKS_128TB
+#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH NR_CHUNKS_3968TB
#else
#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK ADDR_MARK_128TB
#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
Could you also update the comment above this code to say PowerPC64 also
supports 4PB virtual address space?


Sure. I will add



From the comment, arm64 supports 4PB but its NR_CHUNKS_HIGH is only 3840TB,
whereas PowerPC64 here can get to 3968TB. I do not know why arm64’s
4PB is smaller. ;)

Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>

Best Regards,
Yan, Zi