Re: [PATCH] phy: freescale: fsl-samsung-hdmi: return closest rate instead LUT

[Adam Ford]

On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 2:55 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Adam,
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 03:44:26PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:12 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Dominique,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 06:48:50PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > > > [...] and I'm sure there are other improvements that could be made at
> > > > the edges.
> > >
> > > One thing that irritated me is the function names. `phy_clk_round_rate`
> > > sounds too generic. `fsl_samsung_hdmi_phy_clk_round_rate` is long, but
> > > I'd say would be a better match.
> > Uwe,
> >
> > I just sent a patch to rename round_rate and set rate functions to be
> > more explicit.  I also tried to refactor the driver as you requested
> > by simplifying the code, but I didn't have time to integrate my
> > fractional-divder code yet.
> >
> > I will be traveling for most of May, so I won't be able to revisit
> > this again until after May 24.  Hopefully the patches I submitted meet
> > your satisfaction,
>
> I don't feel authoritative for that driver, so please do stuff to please
> the phy maintainers and consider my comments as suggestion from the side
> line.

I thought you had a good idea, and your suggestion made sense.
Getting that kind of feedback makes me a better programmer.

adam

>
> Best regards
> Uwe