Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] mm: Use for_each_valid_pfn() in memory_hotplug

From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Thu Apr 24 2025 - 17:16:15 EST


On 23.04.25 15:33, David Woodhouse wrote:
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 8305483de38b..8f74c55137bf 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1756,12 +1756,10 @@ static int scan_movable_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
{
unsigned long pfn;
- for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn++) {
+ for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, start, end) {

^

struct page *page;
struct folio *folio;
- if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
- continue;
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
if (PageLRU(page))
goto found;
@@ -1805,11 +1803,9 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(migrate_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
- for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
+ for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) {

^

Is there a reason for this space that I am unaware of? :)

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb