Re: [PATCH net-next v25 01/23] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn)

[Sabrina Dubroca]

2025-04-11, 10:04:10 +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> thanks for taking the time to go through my patchset :)
> 
> On 11/04/2025 04:54, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:46:09 +0200 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > > +static int ovpn_netdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > > +				     unsigned long state, void *ptr)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!ovpn_dev_is_valid(dev))
> > > +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +
> > > +	switch (state) {
> > > +	case NETDEV_REGISTER:
> > > +		/* add device to internal list for later destruction upon
> > > +		 * unregistration
> > > +		 */
> > > +		break;
> > > +	case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
> > > +		/* can be delivered multiple times, so check registered flag,
> > > +		 * then destroy the interface
> > > +		 */
> > > +		break;
> > > +	case NETDEV_POST_INIT:
> > > +	case NETDEV_GOING_DOWN:
> > > +	case NETDEV_DOWN:
> > > +	case NETDEV_UP:
> > > +	case NETDEV_PRE_UP:
> > > +	default:
> > > +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Why are you using a notifier to get events for your own device?
> 
> My understanding is that this is the standard approach to:
> 1) hook in the middle of registration/deregistration;
> 2) handle events generated by other components/routines.
> 
> I see in /drivers/net/ almost every driver registers a notifier for their
> own device.

I think most of them register a notifier for their lower device
(bridge port, real device under a vlan, or similar).

I've mentioned at some point that it would be more usual to replace
this notifier with a custom dellink, and that ovpn->registered could
likely be replaced with checking for NETREG_REGISTERED. I just thought
it could be cleaned up a bit later, but it seems Jakub wants it done
before taking the patches :)

-- 
Sabrina