Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Allow to use setters with return value for output-only gpios

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 12:31 PM Mathieu Dubois-Briand
<mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit() function checks if any setter
> callback is present before doing anything. As the new GPIO setters with
> return values were introduced, make this check also succeed if one is
> present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index b8197502a5ac..cd4fecbb41f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -2879,7 +2879,7 @@ static int gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value)
>          * output-only, but if there is then not even a .set() operation it
>          * is pretty tricky to drive the output line.
>          */
> -       if (!guard.gc->set && !guard.gc->direction_output) {
> +       if (!guard.gc->set && !guard.gc->set_rv && !guard.gc->direction_output) {
>                 gpiod_warn(desc,
>                            "%s: missing set() and direction_output() operations\n",
>                            __func__);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
> change-id: 20250411-mdb-gpiolib-setters-fix-b87976992070
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Ah good catch. Since the culprit is already in mainline, would you
mind resending with Cc: stable and Fixes: tags?

Bart