Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] dt-bindings: PCI: Add binding for Toshiba TC956x PCIe switch

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Wed Apr 09 2025 - 11:00:26 EST


On 4/9/25 3:22 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4/1/25 7:52 AM, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/2025 7:26 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 2/26/25 8:30 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:03:58PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>>>>> From: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a device tree binding for the Toshiba TC956x PCIe switch, which
>>>>> provides an Ethernet MAC integrated to the 3rd downstream port and two
>>>>> downstream PCIe ports.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Drop, file was named entirely different. I see other changes, altough
>>>> comparing with b4 is impossible.
>>>>
>>>> Why b4 does not work for this patch?
>>>>
>>>>    b4 diff '20250225-qps615_v4_1-v4-1-e08633a7bdf8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>>>>    Checking for older revisions
>>>>    Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org
>>>>    Nothing matching that query.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like you use b4 but decide to not use b4 changesets/versions. Why
>>>> making it difficult for reviewers and for yourself?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,tc956x.yaml    | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   1 file changed, 178 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,tc956x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,tc956x.yaml
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..ffed23004f0d
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/toshiba,tc956x.yaml
>>>>
>>>> What is "x" here? Wildcard?
>>>
>>> Yes, an overly broad one. Let's use the actual name going forward.
>>>
>> ok I will update the next series the name from tc956x to tc9563 as
>> suggested.
>
> As per internal discussions, 956*4* would be the correct name for this one

I misread. It's supposed to be 3. Sorry for the confusion.

Konrad