Re: [GICv3 ITS]S2IDLE framework does not invoke syscore_ops in GICv3 ITS driver

[Marc Zyngier]

On Mon, 07 Apr 2025 23:51:46 +0100,
Donghyeok Choe <d7271.choe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

> > Do you use any suspend/resume logic in drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-pm.c ?
> No, there are parts of the GIC that require secure access, so the
> GIC save/restore is performed by the firmware.
> Since the GIC-ITS is entirely controlled as a non-secure IP,
> I think it is more efficient to perform save/restore in the kernel.

More efficient? Give me *one* aspect of this save/restore sequence
that is done in a more efficiently way in the kernel. Dumping MMIO
accesses into memory has the exact same cost at EL1, El2 or EL3, and
splitting things along an arbitrary line to paper over bad firmware is
not a valid argument.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.