Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpf, iter: Fix the condition on p when calling stop.

[Yonghong Song]

On 6/10/22 12:44 PM, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> From: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In bpf_seq_read, seq->op->next() could return an ERR and jump to
> the label stop. However, the existing code in stop does not handle
> the case when p (returned from next()) is an ERR. Adds the handling
> of ERR of p by converting p into an error and jumping to done.
>
> Because all the current implementations do not have a case that
> returns ERR from next(), so this patch doesn't have behavior changes
> right now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>